Governing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Policy Implications for Faculty Professional Competence

Authors

  • Doni Anggoro Ari Santoso
  • Agustina Ramadhianti Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Sugianti Somba
  • Nandang Hidayat

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education Policy, AI Governance, Faculty Professional Competence, Qualitative Study

Abstract

This study investigates how artificial intelligence (AI) is governed in higher education institutions and examines the implications of institutional AI governance policies for faculty professional competence. A qualitative policy analysis approach was employed. Data were collected through document analysis of institutional AI-related policies, including academic integrity guidelines and faculty development regulations, as well as semi-structured interviews with faculty members and academic leaders involved in AI governance and implementation. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis guided by an AI governance framework encompassing pedagogical, governance, and operational dimensions. The findings reveal that higher education institutions have increasingly formalized AI governance through institutional policies. However, these policies are largely regulatory in orientation, with a strong emphasis on ethical compliance, academic integrity, and risk mitigation. Explicit pedagogical guidance and systematic support for faculty professional competence development are limited. As a result, faculty members experience uncertainty in applying AI in teaching and assessment practices and rely predominantly on self-directed or informal learning, leading to uneven levels of AI-related professional competence. The study suggests that AI governance in higher education should move beyond compliance-oriented regulation toward an integrative, capacity-building approach. Institutional AI policies need to be aligned with structured faculty development frameworks that incorporate pedagogical guidance, ethical awareness, and operational support to enable responsible and effective AI integration in academic practice.

References

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 38.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3

Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), Article 60.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-1

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Ghimire, A., & Edwards, J. (2024). From guidelines to governance: A study of AI policies in education. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.15601

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

McDonald, N., Johri, A., Ali, A., & Hingle, A. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines. arXiv.

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01659

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Temper, M., Tjoa, S., & David, L. (2025). Higher Education Act for AI (HEAT-AI): A framework to regulate the usage of AI in higher education institutions. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1505370

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Santoso, D. A. A. ., Agustina Ramadhianti, Sugianti Somba, & Nandang Hidayat. (2026). Governing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Policy Implications for Faculty Professional Competence. Candradimuka: Journal of Education, 4(1), 15–25. Retrieved from http://www.jurnal.prismasejahtera.com/index.php/candradimuka/article/view/196