Design of a Story-Writing Training Program for Lower-Grade Elementary School Students

Authors

  • Vickry Ramdhan Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Randi Ramliyana Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Hana Cintia Ayu Radita Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Chykita Gebby Nabella Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60012/cje.v4i2.231

Keywords:

Design-Based Research, Story-Writing Training, Elementary School Students, Writing Skills, Student-Centered Learning

Abstract

This study aims to design a story-writing training program for lower-grade elementary school students that supports structured, creative, and developmentally appropriate writing. The study employs a Design-Based Research (DBR) approach involving needs analysis, initial program development, expert validation, limited implementation, evaluation, revision, and development of the final program. The training consists of activities for generating ideas, developing characters and settings, organizing events, drafting, receiving feedback, revising, editing, and presenting stories. Data reported in this study were obtained through classroom observation, a four-point student questionnaire, and analysis of students’ comments during the implementation. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics, while qualitative comments were organized into recurring themes related to students’ responses to the training. The implementation involved 30 students in Grades 1–3 across six 60-minute sessions. The findings showed a positive overall response (M = 3.45/4.00; 86.25%), with enjoyment receiving the highest mean score (M = 3.60; 90.00%). The findings also indicate that visual media, guided practice, and gradual writing activities supported students’ participation and confidence, while some students continued to require assistance with spelling, sentence construction, and event sequencing. The resulting program was revised to provide shorter instructions, stronger visual support, additional vocabulary, more examples, and a longer drafting period.

References

Anderson, T., dan Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.

Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., dan Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25-38.

Graham, S., Harris, K. R., dan Santangelo, T. (2015). Research-based writing practices and the Common Core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 498–522.

Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., dan Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896.

Koster, M., Tribushinina, E., de Jong, P. F., dan van den Bergh, H. (2015). Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 249–274.

Limpo, T., dan Alves, R. A. (2013). Modeling writing development: Contribution of transcription and self-regulation to Portuguese students’ text generation quality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 401–413.

Zumbrunn, S., dan Krause, K. (2012). Conversations with leaders: Principles of effective writing instruction. The Reading Teacher, 65(5), 346–353.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Vickry Ramdhan, Ramliyana, R. ., Radita, H. C. A. ., & Nabella, C. G. . (2026). Design of a Story-Writing Training Program for Lower-Grade Elementary School Students. Candradimuka: Journal of Education, 4(2), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.60012/cje.v4i2.231